Friday, July 04, 2008

Protestors Interrupt Naturalization Ceremony


As new citizens to the United States of America sat before the home of Thomas Jefferson, Monticello in Charlottesville, Va., hecklers and protestors showed their BDS to our new citizens by disrupting a public event honoring our newest citizens to protest President Bush.

Every year on the Fourth of July, a Naturalization Ceremony is held at Monticello for new citizens who followed the legal path to American Citizenship. President Bush was invited to speak this year, welcoming America’s newest citizens.

As has come to be expected, leftists showed our new citizens the seamier side of citizenship by disrupting the ceremony in their honor, heckling the president repeatedly, waving banners and generally making asses out of themselves.

video

Swearing obscene language, calling the president a fascist and other interruptions actually showed much disrespect for the 76 new American Citizens listening to the president welcome them to citizenship.

President Bush was not there to promote a Republican candidate, to urge support for the War on Terror or to campaign for any cause. He was there welcoming people who left tyranny behind and worked their way towards legal American citizenship. I wouldn’t think it too far a stretch to imagine at least some of those new citizens disagree with the president, but deserve respect for their ceremony welcoming them officially to citizenship.

Of the hecklers, president Bush said, “To my fellow citizens to be, we believe in free speech in the United States of America,” but that did not stop Security from removing the protestors as they continued to disrupt the ceremonies.

The hatred of president Bush has reached such a feverish pitch that even Naturalization Ceremonies are to be disrupted, what can we expect next, someone to defecate on a burning American Flag in the street?

Is this how the left shows their love of America and Patriotism, disrupting ceremonies honoring new citizens?

Posted by Lew Waters at 20:55

24 comments:

  1. That is just like the PRESIDENT to try and be tactful to a bunch of rude morons.
    Disrepectful bunch, those fellow Americans are taking the legal path to citizenship and all these fools can do is to act like that.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Huh - and these Protesters "REPEATEDLY"
    interrupted President George W. Bush in front of New USA citizens.
    Hummm and where were the Police, the Secret Service? Well these New USA Citizens just got introduced to American Socialists behaving as American Socialists behave. Maybe these New USA CITIZENS will take note of American Socialists behavior and interrupt Barack Obama rallies from now till November to repay there hospitality.
    ReplyDelete
  3. You must remember... in Liberalworld, this sort of jabberwocky IS a form of respect.
    ReplyDelete
  4. He's lucky I wasn't there. I would have taken a dump in front of him because he's nothing more than fecal matter.
    ReplyDelete
  5. Can't you feel the love?

    Hey Raoul, did it ever occur to you that your actions would dishonor new citizens, not Bush?

    Oh, that doesn't matter, just so long as you think you slighted Bush, right?

    How dejected you'll all feel after January when you don't have Bush to blame for everything.
    ReplyDelete
  7. BERLIN (Reuters) - A man tore the head from a controversial waxwork figure of Adolf Hitler on the opening day of Berlin's Madame Tussauds museum on Saturday, police said.

    Just minutes after the museum opened, the 41-year-old German man pushed aside two security men guarding the exhibit.

    "Then he went over to the figure and ripped off the head," a police spokesman said.

    I TELL YOU THERE IS NO RESPECT FOR OUR LEADERS ANYWHERE THESE DAYS. WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TO.
    ReplyDelete
  8. Well, wacko, at least they didn't deceive officials by substituting the National Anthem.

    Did you ever think of starting your own blog to make off subject comments??

    Have you ever been to Germany to see how many still feel about Hitler?
    ReplyDelete
  9. Hitler launched unprovoked wars of aggression against countries in which he felt "regime change" was justified including Belgium, Poland, and France. None of these countries had WMDs or posed much of a threat to the recently re-armed Nazi Germany. In reality, he wanted their resources, such as the coal mines in France. He dreamed of a "New German Century" under his rule.

    Sound familiar?
    ReplyDelete
  10. Hitler launched wars of conquest to form a new Reich.

    Your analogy fails due to our not desiring to form any new country's, just to give those countries a fighting chance at freedom.

    Protestors today desire to transform the U.S. into a mirror of the failed Soviet Union and have been striving towards that goal since the '20's.

    Now, what does this have to do with moonbats disrespecting new citizens?
    ReplyDelete
  11. I get it. All protesters are commies. It is so simple.
    ReplyDelete
  12. Once more a day late and a dollar short Lew. You see I don't really blame bush as much as I do his enablers - those who gave him his empty power - voters like YOU who are as guilty as he is. Every time a soldier buys it over there, his/her blood is on YOUR hands. I hope you are proud..
    ReplyDelete
  13. I have to say that rightwing's post did cause me to laugh; as I see some level of correlation.

    But I do not condone the destruction of Hitler's statue, nor do I condone the protesting of the naturalization ceremony.
    This one actually bothers me more than the song replacement.

    I would have thought that maybe they were protesting these new citizens, which is something I would more expect from some I know on the right than those I know on the left.
    Both sides have wackos, and both sides have members with really poor judgment.
    ReplyDelete
  14. Eileen, why would we on the right protest new citizens that attained citizenship LEGALLY?

    Our whole argument is in giving those who enter ILLEGALLY a pass and in some cases, moved ahead of those who follow the law to become citizens.

    It isn't so much the people as it is the ILLEGAL act they commit.

    Raoul, your stupidity is only exceeded by your arrogance. You habve no idea how we feel towards those we lose nor can you understand the mind of those who volunteer for Military Service.

    You think your freedom comes from a piece of paper written long ago? Who protects the meaning of those words written so long ago? It is those who volunteer to fight and possibly die so morons like you have the freedom to hate us.

    “A veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to The 'United States of America', for an amount of 'up to and including my life.'” (Author unknown)

    wacky, it's nice to see finally say something worthwhile.
    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank you for illustrating the words of Samuel Johnson: Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
    ReplyDelete
  16. Scoundrels indeed. There are those who wave the bloody shirt and say how much they love this country and support the troops. However these same people enable the destruction of our constitution and look the other way with a myriad of excuses as to why our returning soldiers do not receive the care to which they are due. The silence of the Right in reference to the recent GI bill was deafening.
    ReplyDelete
  17. I see you support pandering, Cheesey.

    Wacky, I love when you lefties supply quotes without checking into them or seeing what the context was, just keeps you all looking foolish.

    Patriotism is the last refuge for a scoundrel

    Could it be said that those on the left pretending to be patriotic by pandering to the Troops and Veterans are he real 'scoundrels?"

    When all else fails, they pretend to be patriotic? Sound familiar, son?

    Since you like Samuel Johnson so much, here is some more from him,

    "Let us take a patriot, where we can meet him; and, that we may not flatter ourselves by false appearances, distinguish those marks which are certain, from those which may deceive; for a man may have the external appearance of a patriot, without the constituent qualities; as false coins have often lustre, though they want weight."

    "He that wishes to see his country robbed of its rights cannot be a patriot."
    ReplyDelete
  18. raoul said... those who gave President Bush his empty power - voters like YOU who are as guilty as he is.

    Jack said: raoul so using your logic we can safely Blame Democrats for WWI -- WWII --
    The KOREAN War and Vietnam since Democrats voted in Democrat Presidents Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
    Lets be fair now raoul. Those Democrats would be as guilty as those Democrat Presidents for starting those Democrat Wars.

    PS: Interesting Vice Presidential Candidate Bob Dole in 1976 talked about Democrat Wars. raoul you have something in common with former Sen. Bob Dole. Good Job
    ReplyDelete
  19. Yanno, Lew, I sort of like some of these moonbats. Smacking them upside their numb skulls is like therapy.
    ReplyDelete
  20. Yes, Raoul... every time a soldier buys it, their blood is on the hands of whoever voter for the commander in chief. I guess the voters have a helluva lot of blood on their hands because they voted for Madison, Polk, Lincoln, McKinley, Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II. All of those presidents, in case you're as ignorant as you sound, called upon our soldiers to shed blood in one conflict or another. So by your inane reasoning, whoever voted for those 14 presidents all had blood on their hands. Really brilliant reasoning there.
    ReplyDelete
  21. I hate to challenge your grasp of the facts, Hard Cheese... well, actually, that wouldn't be accurate because you don't have any grasp of the facts.

    The horrible Dred Scott v. Sandford, which was a blatent distortion of the Constitution happened with the Democrats and their Southern power base looking on with smiles.
    A Democrat presided when the court declared in Korematsu v. United States that the Constitution allows anyone of a given racial background to be hauled off to a concentration camp and not a word was said.
    A Democrat was president with a Democratic congress when the Consitution was blatently violated to involve America in the Korean War (only Congress can declare war and deploy soldiers under the Constitution) and the voices of protest were silent. On the other hand, when a previous Democrat tried to do the same thing (involve us in the League of Nations which would have allowed the president or the League to use American soldiers at whim), the Republicans of the day used their control of Congress to stonewall him, upholding what the Constitution said.
    As the justices of the Supreme Court were discovering that the Constitution could be read to protect the right to obtain birth control (the famous right to privacy in Griswold v. Conneticuit) there was rarely any protests, especially from the leftists who were supporting this particular instance of Constitution-shredding.
    When Roe v. Wade was handed down, a Republican was president but it was the Democrats and their friends who were overjoyed to see the Constitution blatently trod upon as certain justices indulged their personal opinions (unrelated to the law) to find that killing an unborn baby was Constitionally protected. Republicans, since that day, have been working every angle to put distance between the government and the Court's horrendous decision.
    When Stenberg v. Carhart was handed down, Constitutionally protecting the "right" of partial-birth abortion, the Democrats did everything they could to uphold it and Republicans went out of their way to sidestep the absurdity. But it wasn't until Bush II came on the scene that the Republicans could address the shredding of the Constitution; Clinton happily vetoed their attempts.

    Overwhelmingly, it's the Democrats or their leftist allies (or both) that hunger for the distortion and destruction of the Constitution, as historically proven by what they proudly support. Your attempt to assign blame to the group that consistenly opposes fiddling around with the Constitution is both absurd and almost delusional. Once again, moonbats like you and Iago and Raoul are left without a leg to stand on. But I'm sure you're used to that, by now.
    ReplyDelete
  22. kkmoo's ramblings clearly illustrate the old adage that if you do not know what you are talking about it is difficult to know when youare finished.
    ReplyDelete
  23. And Iago's attempts to be clever demonstrate the truth of the saying that it's better to be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
    ReplyDelete
  24. Somebody should tell those nut-jobs that Bush isn't running again.

    On second thought, never mind.
    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)