I for one fully intend to exercise my option to completely -ignore- FLOTUS in the New Year. Between the "oil spill" print shirt she sported at the Gulf, her $500 French made designer tennis shoes while photo-opping at a feed the hungry event and her $1,500 outfit to 'work' in the WH garden ( I think we've seen about enough? )
I've no doubt she already has ambitious designs on hawking everything from book deals, speaking engagements, children's books and of course her own TV show immediately upon her departure from the WH.
We'll NEVER get rid of her. Another reason to perhaps consider your vote a 'tad' more carefully next time before you open the gates of media over-exposure HELL? And 'what' exactly is her 'message' again? Oh well, doesn't matter. We're stuck with her.
Michelda Marcos-Obama ( she and Imelda would have SO much to talk about wouldn't they! )
I don't mind so much she 'thinks' she's got great legs ( and Julie Newmar she AIN'T! ) it's the 4 hours a day Moochelle spends in front of a mirror ( or teleprompter? ) practicing "the face".
I'm picturing a -total- media blitz! Haircare prdts., diet & exercise infomercials ( if you want "to look like ME girls!" ) and where's my agent Lizzie Grubman!? I've got an ALBUM to get out!
No. It's not how we 'analyze'. This happens to be Victoria's Blog so she sets the topics and frames the discussion. Not surprisingly, it's incredibly consistent w/ her program. If you don't care for it ( start your 'own' blog ) otay?
Firstly, 'we' are not the ones that have chosen to make daily fashion spectacles of ourselves. I've met everyone on the blog and we're not exactly what you'd call "clothes horses".
If you've been following, FLOTUS has had several high profile relationships w/ several high profile designers. Several of whom have since gone out of business. But only after the lamestream media declared MO "a one-woman apparel industry stimulus!"
Oft remarking that she 'may' have inspired upwards of $1 bil. in sales! Sorry but her "dual role" as FLOTUS -and- fashion model are newsworthy whether you like it or not.
The parallel in case you're wondering is that even to the casual observer, she's every bit the empty suit/'recovery' her husband is. The more she flaunts herself ( the more apparent that bcomes )
I've -yet- to see her wearing something that looks like it's been worn more than once? Off the rack so to speak. Is 'that' the message struggling housewives, working and single mothers need to be 'hearing' right now? Analyze that.
"is that the criteria you fake conservatives use to analyze political positions of the president, rediculous, once again."
The whole "fake conservative" thing again. Really? How about the "criteria" you used to "analyze" an "escort" named "Veronica"? Remember her? The one you found through a Portland craigslist ad in November, 2008.
From your November 6, 2008 review at an escort review website called "TNA Review" (http://tnareview.com/providers/show/2043), as "reviewer cnskate36"...
You gave her a "6 - very nice" for "appearance", and a "9 - I forgot it was a service" for "rating". For "The teaser", you wrote;
"very good experience, she was just like a girlfriend that is ready for you".
For the "Juicy details" AND "Length & price", I would have to open an account with TNA Review. I am not going to do that, because I am not a sick degenerate masquerading as a "real" conservative.
You say we are fake? Just think of us as "different". We don't employ the services of a "porn actress" named "Veronica" (and write about it on the internet). We are dissimilar in this regard. Any other theories?
Well, no one ever said she was a fashion queen.
ReplyDeleteI sure miss the style and class Laura Bush brought when s he was First Lady.
I for one fully intend to exercise my option to completely -ignore- FLOTUS in the New Year. Between the "oil spill" print shirt she sported at the Gulf, her $500 French made designer tennis shoes while photo-opping at a feed the hungry event and her $1,500 outfit to 'work' in the WH garden ( I think we've seen about enough? )
ReplyDeleteI've no doubt she already has ambitious designs on hawking everything from book deals, speaking engagements, children's books and of course her own TV show immediately upon her departure from the WH.
We'll NEVER get rid of her. Another reason to perhaps consider your vote a 'tad' more carefully next time before you open the gates of media over-exposure HELL? And 'what' exactly is her 'message' again? Oh well, doesn't matter. We're stuck with her.
OT Warning:
ReplyDeleteInteresting to note He Who Shall Not Be Named is planning a downsized party as he goes to take office!
Is it too much to hope for this is code for what OR state employees should be expecting is coming down the pike?
Or just more absentee Gov'ship?
"I sure miss the style and class Laura Bush brought when she was First Lady."
ReplyDeleteI don't miss the lack of style and class of George Bush.
Well... 'someone' had to say it?
ReplyDeleteMichelda Marcos-Obama ( she and Imelda would have SO much to talk about wouldn't they! )
I don't mind so much she 'thinks' she's got great legs ( and Julie Newmar she AIN'T! ) it's the 4 hours a day Moochelle spends in front of a mirror ( or teleprompter? ) practicing "the face".
I'm picturing a -total- media blitz! Haircare prdts., diet & exercise infomercials ( if you want "to look like ME girls!" ) and where's my agent Lizzie Grubman!? I've got an ALBUM to get out!
is that the criteria you fake conservatives use to analyze political positions of the president, rediculous, once again.
ReplyDelete-rediculous
ReplyDelete+ridiculous
No. It's not how we 'analyze'. This happens to be Victoria's Blog so she sets the topics and frames the discussion. Not surprisingly, it's incredibly consistent w/ her program. If you don't care for it ( start your 'own' blog ) otay?
Firstly, 'we' are not the ones that have chosen to make daily fashion spectacles of ourselves. I've met everyone on the blog and we're not exactly what you'd call "clothes horses".
If you've been following, FLOTUS has had several high profile relationships w/ several high profile designers. Several of whom have since gone out of business. But only after the lamestream media declared MO "a one-woman apparel industry stimulus!"
Oft remarking that she 'may' have inspired upwards of $1 bil. in sales! Sorry but her "dual role" as FLOTUS -and- fashion model are newsworthy whether you like it or not.
The parallel in case you're wondering is that even to the casual observer, she's every bit the empty suit/'recovery' her husband is. The more she flaunts herself ( the more apparent that bcomes )
I've -yet- to see her wearing something that looks like it's been worn more than once? Off the rack so to speak. Is 'that' the message struggling housewives, working and single mothers need to be 'hearing' right now? Analyze that.
As if our washed-out talkshow host has such great style. Time to cure the two-tone and go get a new suit.
ReplyDeletecnskate36 said...
ReplyDelete"is that the criteria you fake conservatives use to analyze political positions of the president, rediculous, once again."
The whole "fake conservative" thing again. Really? How about the "criteria" you used to "analyze" an "escort" named "Veronica"? Remember her? The one you found through a Portland craigslist ad in November, 2008.
From your November 6, 2008 review at an escort review website called "TNA Review" (http://tnareview.com/providers/show/2043), as "reviewer cnskate36"...
You gave her a "6 - very nice" for "appearance", and a "9 - I forgot it was a service" for "rating". For "The teaser", you wrote;
"very good experience, she was just like a girlfriend that is ready for you".
For the "Juicy details" AND "Length & price", I would have to open an account with TNA Review. I am not going to do that, because I am not a sick degenerate masquerading as a "real" conservative.
You say we are fake? Just think of us as "different". We don't employ the services of a "porn actress" named "Veronica" (and write about it on the internet). We are dissimilar in this regard. Any other theories?
Oh comeon, give the radio hostess a break. She has a great face for radio.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAlways a scream to watch someone who has a butter face & body blast another woman on her appearance and style.
ReplyDelete