Friday, June 29, 2012

Pete the Banker: Be Wary of the Rosy Housing Numbers

Be wary of these fluffy mass media headlines, “U.S. single-family home prices picked up for a third month in a row “ and “Annual pending home sales are up 13.3%, while, compared to April 2012, May is up nearly 6%”
Most owner occupied (as distinct from investor)  residential pending sales are subject to financing.  Just because a home purchaser enters an earnest money agreement it doesn’t mean that the purchase will close three months later if it can’t be financed.   Increases in pending sales don’t necessarily translate into actual sales. 
Additionally, investors cash purchases still dominate the residential sales market.  Those markets recently seeing the largest sales increases as reported by both Core Logic and Case Shiller showed a heavy concentration of distressed sales according to Diane Olick of CNBC

Two major problems persist in the housing market.  Distressed sales and potential distressed properties inventory still dominate the market.  The potential home inventory exceeds the stated inventory because of shadow inventory numbers and distressed values of housing.  The National Association of Realtors figures include houses on the market, not potential future inventory.   The estimated shadow inventory is up to 4MM units.   This number is further compounded by underwater borrowers (11 MM by most estimates with Zillow even higher ) who are trapped in existing homes at values less than their mortgage balance as well as by mortgage modifications (some 1MM under HAMP and 4 MM Hope Now) many of which re-default within 12 – 18 months after modification.  Both of these sources will inflate future housing inventory levels. 
The second problem is financing.  Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist said, "The housing market is clearly superior this year compared with the past four years,"  and  "Actual closings for existing-home sales have been notably higher since the beginning of the year and we’re on track to see a 9 to 10% improvement in total sales for 2012."  Notice that Yun states that sales will increase 10% this year, yet according to the Mortgage Bankers Association sales are only 20% of total current residential mortgage loan financings.  Refinances, not housing sales, are driving the mortgage financing market.  Even a 10% increase in sales this year belies a healthy housing market.
The Mortgage Bankers Association projects total single family residential financings of $1.2 Trillion this year.  While that is slightly higher than last year’s results and  20% higher than their earlier projection this year, it is still only one half of the total financing volume in 2007.  The financing market is still overly dependent upon Freddie, Fannie and the FHA.  These government entities in the absence of Administration and Congressional reform (the House has passed reform measures, Harry Reid and the Senate seem absent), now provide more than 85% of residential financing.   And with every home refinanced, the archaic GSE model draws additional capital funds from the American taxpayer, a subsidy engineered to perpetuate the government’s failed social engineering.  Until private funds return to the mortgage market (likely requiring higher rates commensurate with risk), financing volume and increasing owner occupied homeownership will languish. 
Washington, DC and this Administration continue to rely upon active Federal interference and artificially low interest rates to magically re-awaken the housing market.  It hasn’t worked over the past 3+ years and it won’t work.  Until the residential housing market is unfettered, hope of a sustained improvement in the housing and housing finance markets will continue to be nothing more than myth!

Pete the Banker is a Portland area banker. And that's all we'll say because we know what happens to Portland Businessmen who are more conservative who speak truth to power, er, tyrants.

5 comments:

  1. Unfettered.
    Pete, NOTHING is unfettered by federal manipulation and interference any more.
    I believe you and I will have to be satisfied with fond memories of "Fairly Free Enterprise".

    If I were a retiring democrat politician and were writing my resume, I'd substitute "Monk with a vow of silence" for my experience in politics. Somehow, I have a feeling that those dems are NOT going to be popular for a couple of decades.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Steve,

    "Pete, NOTHING is unfettered by federal manipulation and interference any more."

    Great point. My counterpoint,

    A Democrat proclaiming a monastic lifestyle and promising a "vow of silence" is like a mosquito proclaiming abstinence while feasting on blood!

    And my satisfaction will not be fulfilled by simple Democratic promises of real theological rebirth, nor fond memories of Free Enterprise. Perhaps found memories of Free Enterprise, however.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pete,

    If GSE's provide 85% of the 'financing' what's the balance ( hard money..? ) I think it goes without saying, provided we're given a window to allow market reforms to take hold, as private lenders go to re-price the REAL risk, it will only further drive down home values.

    Again, in keeping w/ "Let States Fail!" it's a painful but necessary part of the healing process. But we'll continue to kick the can and Extend & Pretend (TM)

    To be clear, I hold -both- parties equally responsible going INTO the bubble. However, Post Bust, Dims have turned this into an unworkable nightmare. Talk about Obstructionist?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Marshall,

    The balance is the private banking system and the financing of so called non conforming or the new term "qualifying" loans (generally don't fit Fannie, Freddie or FHA standards, that is in most cases the loan is too large). There may also be some hard money sources, as well, albeit minor.

    Availability of financing is one element of supporting home demand and home values. But that assumes operation of a free and competitive market and at this point the residential mortgage market is an artificial creation of the Federal Government which is acting as a monopoly. It is driving competition from the market by artificially pricing of funds (w the Fed's help) at rates unjustifiably low especially given levels of risk. The Federal Government itself however can and is constrained by its own limitations and accordingly is relying upon restrictive underwriting and constraints which deprive many of the opportunity to purchase and finance despite low rates. Those who refinance their existing homes at conservative loan to values have less trouble qualifying today, as do investors who bring cash to the table. Those seeking to purchase are generally seeking larger loans relative to value on the property than current financing environment allows. Purchases presently account for only about 20% of financing.

    The housing market has its own set of well publicized issues. Values were artificially stimulated by low rates and easy money which drove housing demand prior to 2005 - 2006 peak and which ultimately resulted in the collapse of the supporting residential capital markets in 2007. Demand for housing is now largely constrained by uncertainty over the economy including languishing economic growth and sustained unemployment and further hampered by largely elusive financing at least for home buyers. Housing supply is also largely impacted by uncertainty. Recent lack of construction after the overbuilding boom early in the century seems to help little in alleviating the over supply created in the face of everlasting government initiatives which directly interfere with market correction by protracting the time necessary to bring homes in default and foreclosure to the market. Government modification programs actually compound it with high percentages of borrowers re defaulting within 12 - 18 months. To this add the "shadow" inventory of 11MM underwater, borrowers who are stuck in their homes regardless of their desire to move, and one can see why the demand still seems to overwhelm supply.

    To Be Continued

    ReplyDelete
  5. Marshall (continued)

    I agree that the real estate and real estate finance markets must correct, but three things have to happen. To correct the real estate supply problem, the liquidity and regulatory buffer needs to be removed from the banks so that they are forced to deal with and process delinquencies more quickly as was done in early 1990's. This Administration has done everything it can to prevent such a correction. The massive amounts of capital injected into the banks by Fed and Treasury have allowed them to delay action on foreclosures and REO's, prevented them from having to unload inventory and therefore allowing them to hold homes off the market indefinitely.

    Restore free competitive market for mortgage financing. The Obama Administration seems to have been satisfied with doing nothing but issue its early 2011 white paper on reform of the residential financing system. Beyond that it has merely resisted Congressional Republican efforts to introduce the very free market concepts that Treasury suggested in that white paper. Incidentally, trade groups like the National Association of Realtors and to a certain extent the Mortgage Bankers Association have also lobbied against many of these suggested true free market reforms. This may initially raise rates, compressing home values at least from current levels but in longer term it will return competitive financing market and market equilibrium at optimal pricing.

    Finally, the housing demand must recover with a return of sustainable economic growth, lower unemployment levels and less uncertainty so consumers will again have confidence in their economic future.

    ReplyDelete