At the outset, I’m neither shocked nor
surprised at the outcome. Like most common-sense people I regard Obamacare as
an abomination and a one-way ticket to bloating the federal budget even more
than it is. But I also know something about courts and the law, so I never
expect a court to do what everyone thinks it will or should do – courts do what
they do. Welcome to a hard dose of judicial reality.
But in that reality is a great big
club – the right club – that will beat the beast to death: The hatred Americans
have for being over taxed, especially to the tune of $1.76 trillion. Obamacare
is now the largest tax increase in American history.
From
my early days in activism I learned that relying on courts for your
political
salvation is a fools’ errand. Political issues can only be decided where
political issues are always decided, and that’s in the streets, at the ballot
box and in the Legislature, in this case Congress. Obamacare is a political
issue, and it ultimately must be decided politically.
By
upholding the individual mandate as a tax, Mitt Romney now has a new campaign
tag line that will damage President Obama and the Democrats: The Obamacare tax
on the middle class
Tax,
tax, tax, tax, tax, tax – say it often enough and it will stick.
So,
there’s some comfort to be taken from this statement found at the outset of
Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion: “We do not consider whether the Act embodies
sound policies. That judgment is entrusted to the Nation’s elected leaders.”
And I would add it includes the judgment of the voters.
The court took pains to emphasize its tradition to bend over
backwards, if necessary, to uphold a legislative act rather than strike it
down. By calling the Obamacare individual mandate a tax rather than a penalty
for not engaging in commerce, the Court found a peg upon which to hang its
judicial robes.
“There were not five votes to uphold (Obamacare) on the
ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the
states to require everyone to buy health insurance. However, five Justices
agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is
a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power. That is all that
matters. Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what
other parts of the statute were constitutional…”
I’ve
read a lot of court opinions in my time that do pretty much what’s described –
it’s just that this time, the stakes were much higher.
What
made me nervous during the run up to the decision was the proliferation of
pundits and amateurs making cock-sure predictions that the law would be struck
down. When the like-minded talk exclusively with each other, they convince
themselves that their hopes are facts and that their facts control. Courts
don’t work that way, and people need to understand that.
Literally,
within seconds of the decision and opinion being made public, the Internet was
swamped with what I can only call dopey statements from the know-nothing wing
of the conservative movement. “Chief Justice John Roberts is now dead to me.”
“Impeach the Supreme Court.”
Perhaps
the worst was this one dumped on one of my Facebook posts on the decision: “Bush screws us AGAIN! This is how Progressives
work and to say that people wanted Jeb Bush to run as Pres or VP?!” Even people
ostensibly on our side of the political fence blame Bush.
Because
we’re now faced with the political reality of the survival of Obamacare, it’s a
waste of time, and politically lazy, to blame it on judges, Democrats,
Congressional Republicans, George W. Bush or anyone but the person we see every
morning in the mirror. In other words, let’s screw our courage to the sticking
place, quit worrying about what your boss or your neighbor or your kids think
about your beliefs, get out into the streets, organize the socks off everyone
you know and fight like hell without rest until Obamacare is repealed.
Or get used
to it.

Actually it is Obomneycare.
ReplyDeleteFight like hell until Obamacare is repealed? No, I think the fighting part will probably need to go on a lot longer than that, like, maybe generations worth. There's just too many out there who vote for the one who cares, as if caring were the only matter at issue, just as their parents did. It isn't as if there wasn't a fight about passing Obamacare. It's that they got more votes.
ReplyDeleteScott, You are SO correct. People who expect justice, especially thorough justice, from a Court will always be disappointed and left wondering, or stunned.
ReplyDeleteThere is no longer any need for oaths like "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth", because much truth is pared away, disallowed for purposes of THIS conversation, well before a jury gets within ear shot. And when the limited truth HAS been said, the Judge takes over.
The Justices reported out loud that it is not their job to protect the public. If you ask me, that is what the Constitution aimed to do. That and define the government, with the same goal in mind. Since defending the Constitution defends the public, a job the Supreme Court declines, I wish they would state aloud just exactly what they ARE supposed to work to protect.
Walt, I agree with you as well. I bet that there is no way to determine what the healthcare market WAS before they ruined it with Obamacere, and if that WERE determined, much of it would not be able to qualify under the regulations to re-start what was terminated. This will be much worse by January. My estimate for repair of the healthcare system is: Never.
As for repairing the Constitutional judicial precedent we now "enjoy"?: No chance, ever.