No.
In fact, the state of the housing finance industry remains unchanged, if not worse, since this Administration took office. Their only accomplishment on the subject is to have the Treasury Department issue the White Paper (referenced below) over two years after they took office which recommended three alternatives all of which specified less government involvement in financing residential real estate. As this article suggests, the Republican House responded with various pieces of legislation to implement, all of which found resistance by the Administration and died in the Democrat Senate.
If
Obama would discuss policy, it would be interesting what excuse he
would use to explain lack of initiative on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and
the Residential Capital Markets.
In the intervening period, the
residential mortgage market has dwindled to roughly half the volume
present in 2007 and virtually all financing has been done by either the
former GSE’s and the FHA at taxpayer expense. As a result, despite the
glowing recent reports in the press, residential sales remain depressed
and particularly those residential purchases by homeowners, rather the
investors, who require financing. (See the two charts nearby)
It
is nice to hear that the Romney team is addressing this long term
problem which has received scant attention from Obama, and little real
analysis from the Mass Media!
Here's what VP nominee Paul Ryan got passed in the House (but died in Harry Reid's Senate):
Even one of the Obama Administration suggestions was to go to a fully privatized mortgage market:
Please note that sales are not only still near the bottom of the cycle but dramatically lower than 2006 and even far below June 2009 levels, 6 months after Obama took office. This despite the near euphoria in the Press over the Spring numbers.
Curiously even the White Paper issued by the Administration had to await the first quarter of 2011 for issuance, given other Administration priorities.
Here's what VP nominee Paul Ryan got passed in the House (but died in Harry Reid's Senate):
Ryan's rationale is that the game has changed since the housing meltdown:
The long-term outlook of the Ryan plan involves a complete wind-down of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and an end to the $188 billion in bailouts so far.
The Ryan budget would "privatize the business of government-owned housing giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, so they no longer expose taxpayers to trillions of dollars' worth of risk."
"Taxpayers' exposure to Fannie and Freddie, once an implicit guarantee, has now become an explicit obligation to cover its debts," Ryan wrote in his plan. "The housing-finance system of the future will allow private-market secondary lenders to fairly, freely and transparently compete, with the knowledge that they will ultimately bear appropriate risk for the loans they guarantee. Their viability and profitability will be determined, not by political favoritism, but by the soundness of their practices and the value of their services."Many in the industry, feel a completely private system – one that hasn't existed since Fannie was chartered in 1938 – would be unlikely to ever arrive.”
Even one of the Obama Administration suggestions was to go to a fully privatized mortgage market:
“The Obama administration released three options last year Congress could pursue, which includes various degrees of government support to the future mortgage market, including a completely private option. But that was where the process stopped outside of roughly 15 bills passed by the House, each largely duplicative of the conservatorship agreements.
Please note that sales are not only still near the bottom of the cycle but dramatically lower than 2006 and even far below June 2009 levels, 6 months after Obama took office. This despite the near euphoria in the Press over the Spring numbers.
Curiously even the White Paper issued by the Administration had to await the first quarter of 2011 for issuance, given other Administration priorities.
Pete, Obama HAS made a few proposals for legislation or action which had the look and feel of sensible suggestions. Some actually Conservative-like and Constitutional.
ReplyDeleteBut he has an ace up his sleeve. He is in FULL control of the Senate. Obama can derail in advance ANYTHING which, for purely political or theatrical purposes, he mentions or demands as a solution to a problem he really prefers to exacerbate than cure.
I think Obama's plans for our real estate and its value have nothing to do with our private property interests or needs.
Ryan's suggestions seem to consider FIRST the interests of the property owner and the Country and the taxpayer.
You're onto something there, Steve.
DeleteRepublican pot meet Democratic kettle.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks, Pete, for this excellent exposure of the truth of what is happening in the housing market, and Fannie and Freddie.
ReplyDeleteIt is no wonder that Obama's original economics guru, liberal Keynesian Larry Summers, tagged Obama as the "Home Alone President," without a clue as to what to do. (See, e.g., Suskind's "Confidence Men).
Maybe Obama should turn to his personal housing advisor who got Obama such a great deal on the Obama estate in Chicago, Tony Rezko, if he has any free time on visiting day.
Rees,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment. Had missed the Obama tag as the "Home Alone President". Perhaps that accounts for his inaction or ineptitude. Still trying to fight off the Hamburglar?! :)
Steve,
Would like your disclosure of the "sensible recommendations" of Obama with regard to housing. The Treasury White paper on its surface sounded OK, but I think it was simply a Trojan horse meant to buy additional time. Curious, since they waited over two years to get to it, allegedly addressing the most serous problem facing the Administration when it took office but they have yet to enact or follow up.
Agree with your assessment of Ryan.
Rhubarb,
Hard to take someone tagged rhubarb seriously when they are addressing pots and kettles. Interesting, I always thought the GSE's were primarily a Democrat vehicle to control of the real estate finance industry, circa 1938 and 1970 with the avowed GSE purpose to provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the housing market.
Well kettle or cauldron might be an applicable description given the tumult and incendiary demise of capital markets in 2007 and financial institutions in 2008. I guess you have to give the Dems and GSE's some credit. They certainly haven't provided much liquidity or stability, but housing certainly is a lot cheaper in 2012!
Pete, you state my point exactly as I had thought it regarding the mimicking of conservative principles by Obama's team. With you 100%, as always.
DeleteYou will not find me defending this Administrations machinations.
Steve,
ReplyDeleteThanks.
Sorry, I just haven't learned to appreciate your cynicism yet. Interesting (and correct) use of of the term mimic. I guess I wouldn't normally describe Obama's action as mimicry, but the term apparently infers derision.
Pete, I view the Obama tactic of pretending at conservatism and his "desire for bi-partisanship" to have the same purposeful aim as that of Photuris.
Delete