What is the practical difference,
in terms of freedom, between, Progressive liberals like Obama, Feinstein,
Schumer, and the Mayor of Baltimore waving dollars at Americans (collected fromtaxpayers or borrowed from Communist China) and calling on Americans to
inform on one another's ownership of guns, legal or illegal --
including apparently children turning in their gun-owning parents a la
Big Brother in Orwell's "1984" -- and such self-proclaimed
"socialists" as Lenin, Stalin, Hitler and Mao
waving guns instead of dollars at their subject peoples to disarm them and leave all the weapons in the hands of their totalitarian socialist governments, and, of course, in the hands of other criminals?
waving guns instead of dollars at their subject peoples to disarm them and leave all the weapons in the hands of their totalitarian socialist governments, and, of course, in the hands of other criminals?
The end result is the same--the
end of freedom.
That doesn't change because
Progressive bless each other narcissistically in depriving Americans of their
constitutional right to bear arms, on the ground that that their gooey liberal
motives are really so pure and they only want to "serve the people"
and, most of all, "protect the children."
The philosopher George Santyana
was right to warn that "those who forget their history are doomed to
repeat it." So was "Orwell" right. So were the American Founders
who armed the American people to create freedom, and wrote a constitution
protecting the right of the American people to remain armed if they were to
preserve that freedom.
See the video here.
Rees Lloyd is a civil right attorney, American Legion and Veterans activist, and Victoria Taft Blogforce member.
See the video here.
Rees Lloyd is a civil right attorney, American Legion and Veterans activist, and Victoria Taft Blogforce member.
No comments:
Post a Comment